With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas, should people be looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places? Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas?
It is true that the demand of people using natural energy sources is increasing. While I accept that there are both benefits and drawbacks of this issue, I would argue that it brings more advantages.
On the one hand, the option to looking for new remote places to get more sources is disadvantageous to some extent. Firstly, exploiting gas and oil from unknown places causes deplete natural resources at this area. This may lead environmental degradation. Secondly, human try to look for more sources from nature can cause some problems of an ecological crisis which threatens the existence of a lot of animals that live in the natural environment. For example, when people try to exploit gas as much as possible at the same area, the living environment of wild animals such as tigers, monkeys, and snakes will be destroyed. This may lead to some of them dead, some of them standing on the edge of extinction.
On the other hand, I believe that having more gas and oil for using has undeniable advantages. First, the demand of people for using energy sources for life and manufacture be less severe which allows both of the food industry and heavy industry have enough gas and oil to continuing their manufacture. Furthermore, the economy of developing countries where are exploited for natural resources becomes more developed. If people want to exploit sources in this area, they must invest in transport infrastructure which allows these places are given countless opportunities to be received investment from government.
In conclusion, it seems to me that there are many advantages for the exploiting the rural area to have more sources, although this way has some notable disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03914590747 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83277150862 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548042704626 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3594182444 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373838221187 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127430650944 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758455612418 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201735330926 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863399156511 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.