An increasing number of advertisement on tv aim at children. What are the effect of television advertising?
Should television advertising be controlled?
Nowadays, all kids like to stare at TV’s screens to watch commercial advertisements. Thousands of them were produced very funny, eyes catching aim to children. There are huge effects to their innocent minds and we should do something to control the bad effects to our next generations.
First of all, advertising is very interesting even for adults. Thus, kids are very easy to pay attention on the screen for hours. This is an unhealthy activity and harmful to their eyesight. We can see more and more kids wear optical glasses at their very young age. Secondly, sometimes the languages that used in advertisements are not suitable for small kids. One day, you can hear your child speaks slang words or even bad words and you have no idea where are they from? The answer is:” They learned it from TV or friends who watch TV most of their time”. Lastly, there are some researches show that advertisement speaking speed is too fast which effect to children listening skill. They may not understand what advertisement is talking about but their brains still receive nonstop information during watching them. The brain’s functions will be paralyzed because over loading and they are easy to get distract while studying or reading.
Television advertising is difficult to be controlled because it is the main source to earn money for TV channels. But adults can control how long the kids can watch TV and which channels are suitable for their age. So, If there are no strict advertising polices to keep them in line, we will have to control what, where, and when our kids can watch television.
In conclusion, television advertising has many drawbacks effect to our children. It is a race between commercial companies and hard to be controlled even it should be. The best way to protect your child is turning off the TV and bring them to the park.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, in conclusion, talking about, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91482649842 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70628265471 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589905362776 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7991376849 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.0 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6842105263 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334922621128 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100036421579 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901462636208 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217496908947 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598616742719 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.