With an increasing population communicating via Internet and text message face to face communication will became a thing in the past To what extent do you agree

Essay topics:

With an increasing population communicating via Internet and text message, face to face communication will became a thing in the past. To what extent do you agree?

Nowadays, with the development of advanced communication technology, interacting with other people on the internet become more and more popular. Several people argued that traditional communication will be behind the times and be replaced by theses modern communication methods. I partly agree with this view.

To begin with, there are some positive influences of increasing population communicating via the internet. First anf foremost, this way is as easy as pie for people to make new friends all over the world. In detailed, people need only a smartphone or a computer which connects internet in order to talk with friends everywhere and everytime. For example, a huge number of people use Facebook, which is the most popular social networking sites so as to share their emotions or make small talks with other people. Moreover, communicating via the internet helps residents save time and money. For instance, previously, to talk with relationships or friends who live oversea, people must make international calls which cost them great deal. But now, thanks to internet, people can communicate by some applications such as Facebook, Skype or Viber. Besides advantages, this communication methods have some drawbacks. One of the disadvantges which i want to say is that texting and social media cause the downfall of society's interpersonal communication. In fact, a lot of people only are at their homes and do not go out for interacting with one another. This seems be a virtual life anf the strong relationships will not be built. Secondly, the information on the internet may be not accurate anf the fact shows that some people will be tricked by uncensored news.

On the other hands, face to face communication also is beneficial to the humankind. Firstly, gestures body language plays an integral part in conveying messages. It is clearly seen that conventional communication method will raise the interaction and strengthen the relationships. In addition, it is safer for people to expose the right information source and it is easier to keep a privacy than communicating via the internet.

In conclusion, although there are some positive impacts of online communication on people, I strongly believe that it is impossible to eliminate face to face communication entirely because some disadvantages which listed above.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (40 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...he most popular social networking sites so as to share their emotions or make small talk...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 943, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...rawbacks. One of the disadvantges which i want to say is that texting and social ...
^
Line 3, column 1289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion on the internet may be not accurate anf the fact shows that some people will...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32162162162 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14688037576 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564864864865 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1122310024 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.45 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297517935017 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967829920428 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753355935716 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200068182591 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305773250572 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.