Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
In our modern life, traffic and pollution have been becoming a global issue that must be taken into consideration and a group of people believes that the optimal solution is rising petrol costs. From my point of view, I partly agree with this idea but I think there are more effective ways to deal with those problems.
Increasing the price of gasoline is one of several solutions to decline the number of vehicles and exhausted gas but it is not the best way. As we can see in the first period, people will tend to decrease the frequency of using their car or motorbike and take communal transportation instead, or even dislike going far away. However, the consequences of this rule are obviously anticipated, which affect the economy and result in social problems. The number of sold vehicles has dropped while a large amount of gasoline is in stock, which may lead to the bankruptcy of many companies as well as the average income of workers in this area will be lower down. Moreover, where a cutting point of the rise is and in some cases, the demand of using individual cars is necessary, expenditure of petrol is overpaid.
There are more useful measures to encounter with growing traffic and pollution than we thought, which need the contribution of both civilians and government. The government should encourage people to use public transportation such as bus, train, subway instead of cars or limousines and hold a campaign walking or cycling to work, which benefits for the health and also be more eco-friendly. Besides, studies about electrical vehicles and renewable resources including solar, wind, tidal and nuclear power must be taken into account to replace fossil fuel energy, giving back our green planet.
In conclusion, although there are some positive effects of increasing petrol payment, the negative ones are outweighed, so that to reduce the traffic and gas emission problems, public transportation plays an important role paralleled with finding renewable energy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06382978723 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73805020269 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.8681344844 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.454545455 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9090909091 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131677760396 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486155734486 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406862008569 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805482797719 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027024667796 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.