Along with the development of society, traffic has been growing very fast due to the risen demand of movement to go from a departure to a destination of humans, which also inflicts so many pollution issues. There are some arguments that the optimal solution is to increase the petrol price. This essay will show my point of view about this problem and suggest the best way to resolve it.
In terms of the traffic growth matter, it is mainly because we are driving private vehicles more than before. That leads to the fact that the number of means of transport has been escalating day by day, which is understandable because people would rather choose to drive by themselves and not have to wait for the public transports like buses in business days as they do not want their precious time to be dependent. Except some cases they have to go a long distance or do not have any private vehicle, they will look for the community traffic.
By figuring out the reasons for traffic increase and predisposition of passengers in traffic option, we can tell raising the price level of petrol is also an effective measure in which the passengers will be affected in a passive way. They tend not to waste more money for petrol, so some of them would probably abandon their private cars and transfer to public transportation. Moreover, petrol is also an unrenewable resources that is very critical to be preserved. Hence, this way will be able to lessen the amount of petrol exploited and definitely ease pollution problems like air and water contamination.
In conclusion, I totally agree that the most significant method here is rising the petal price, it not just impacts the conciousness of users but directly improves our environment in a positive direction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a passive way" with adverb for "passive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n which the passengers will be affected in a passive way. They tend not to waste more money for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'resource'?
Suggestion: resource
...Moreover, petrol is also an unrenewable resources that is very critical to be preserved. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82724252492 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70647305785 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598006644518 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.6507804772 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.090909091 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202954847937 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721300038123 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436293915887 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105907932531 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538510586782 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.