Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? What other measures do you think might be effective?
In order to curb the increasing menace of traffic and pollution, raising petrol prices is suggested to be the most effective method. However, I disagree, and believe that there are other measures that can yield better results.
A rise in petrol prices can definitely deter people from using their own cars for daily commute, as it can increase financial burden. As a result, fewer cars will ply on the road, thus reducing traffic and pollution. However, this will also have negative consequences by affecting other transport modes in many ways. Firstly, a hike in fuel cost will cause a concurrent increase in ticket prices of public transports as well, such as buses, taxis, etc. Secondly, transport vehicles that are used to transport essential commodities such as, vegetables, fruits, etc., will also have to pay a higher price for their journey. This may lead to inflation in costs of essential commodities and further increase the economic burden on people. Thus, this solution may solve traffic and pollution problem, but it will also give rise to other problems in turn.
However, there are other methods that can be implemented to reduce these problems. First one being, government can implement certain campaigns or programs that encourage people to reduce individual car usage. For example, increasing awareness about car-pooling or restricting numbers of cars by allowing only certain number of cars to run on roads on daily basis. Further, government also need to invest more money into development of public transport and infrastructure, so that more and more people are encouraged to use these facilities.
In conclusion, traffic and pollution are major problems plaguing today's urban cities. However, increasing petrol prices will not help solve it and other effective measures such as car sharing, improvement in public transport facilities can help decrease these problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ket prices of public transports as well, such as buses, taxis, etc. Secondly, tra...
^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...ng petrol prices will not help solve it an other effective measures such as car sharing,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'measure'?
Suggestion: measure
...ll not help solve it an other effective measures such as car sharing, improvement in pub...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73847281041 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7228088987 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143397900275 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563049003843 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494035671403 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114947772198 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568457141305 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.