Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Nowadays, the use of vehicles are increasing excessively which causes environmental pollution as well as traffic problems. Some people think that rising the price of fuel can solve this problem. However, I am disagree with this statement. So, in the following paragraphs I shall discuss this view and give some other effective solutions.
To begin with, increasing the price of petrol may invoke hard feelings to those people but wouldn’t change their behaviors. So, they even continue using vehicles though petrol cost high. I think instead of solving the problems it can create other more difficulties. In Nepal, most of the people have to depend on low region for food because in some areas it is difficult to grow crops due to different climate and soil infertility. So, if there is high cost in transportation then obviously food will be expensive. Therefore people have to struggle to survive.
There are various kinds of methods to solve this problem. First of all, we can use other electrical resources such as cell powered or solar powered to move vehicles instead of using petrol, diesel. They are non harmful to the environment. People can create other modern types of vehicles also. I personally think that government should encourage people to use new vehicles and avoid old vehicles. Lastly, we should control over industrial wastages, which is major problem for increasing pollution. As a result, reducing the number of vehicles in the road wouldn’t return us our fresh environment. So, using other sources for moving motor will be better solution.
In conclusion, it will be effective measures to use electrical resources and controll industrial wastes rather than increasing the price of petrol.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...l can solve this problem. However, I am disagree with this statement. So, in the followi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...different climate and soil infertility. So, if there is high cost in transportation th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... then obviously food will be expensive. Therefore people have to struggle to survive. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...n create other modern types of vehicles also. I personally think that government sho...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, so, then, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23021582734 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80818009969 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589928057554 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4999905134 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5263157895 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6315789474 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21052631579 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161881515032 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498355292727 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416291951741 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11862688706 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378156578796 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.