Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
There is no suspicious that traffic jam and pollution from vehicles have become popular problems. Some people say that solving these problems is to need to raise the price of petrol. I completely disagree with this idea, it is just a simple solution and we need more strict solutions to address these problems.
First of all, if petrol prices are increased, this will likely lead to less petrol being used and this can make the environment cleaner. However, it will also raise the cost of anything that uses petrol in its production or in transport such as produce television, fridge or air condition... Thus, this can lead to slower economic growth as less is bought and produced. I know there will be less traffic jam and less pollution as well. Nevertheless, I do not think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages.
On the other hand, traffic problems can be dealt with by making drivers pay more to use certain roads in certain times. Besides, we can improve the choice of public transport services. For example, underground train systems were built in Japan or Korea... This has been very effective in those countries and then traffic on the roads would be dramatically reduced.
While pollution could also be reduced by encouraging people to use energy more effectively and cleaner fuels need to be developed. In the modern world, technology is already available to produce electric cars that would be both quieter and leaner to use, Moreover, the government could mention consequences that vehicles affected the environment.
In conclusion, I believe that solving these problems is need more than a simple rise in the price of petrol. Therefore, I think there are many better alternative solutions available.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05594405594 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7429975219 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.921194419 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17568384575 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571534813988 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379461183416 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929518498305 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190157576522 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.