Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Pollution from burning fossil fuel is one of our modern day problem. Governments have taken several steps to deter this problem where charging high for petrol is one of them. I entirely agree with the statement but other steps like imposing import duty for cars and improving public transport can help the process.
Firstly, in order to run a car people needs to buy gas so, simply by increasing the price of petrol will automatically discourage a certain portion of people to buy petrol. Specially, people who are on a tight budget, this will force them to think elsewhere. If we look closely then it becomes clear that the country where petrol price is relatively low tend to cause more air pollution. United Arab Emirates can be a good example of this, where per capita pollution is higher than any other country in the world.
Actually, by only increasing the price of petrol alone will not bring much fruitfulness. Other steps like imposing taxes to cars may help to reduce the number of cars overall. If we can reduce the car import from other countries then car usage will go down because only handful of countries manufacture cars. For instance, Singapore, where car tax is higher than the actual price thus helps to reduce cars.
Beside that, it is the responsibility of the government to give people the option to find an alternative to their cars. Most people these days are forced to drive finding to alternative. Government needs to build adequate public transport system as reliable as reliable as private transports. Increasing import tax on cars and at the same time giving people the option to use public transport will bring down the fossil fuel consumption.
In conclusion, Charging high for petrol maybe the best available solution but only this method alone cannot confront the pollution crisis hence other steps need to be taken.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...his will force them to think elsewhere. If we look closely then it becomes clear t...
^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'as reliable'.
Suggestion: as reliable
... build adequate public transport system as reliable as reliable as private transports. Increasing impor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91746031746 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53508711224 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55873015873 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8237332819 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8125 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111595085399 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385617183217 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321923354418 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679937136134 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330920113225 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.