Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problem
What extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
In the world today, whether or not there should be a sharp increase in the price of petrol with a view to addressing traffic problems as well as environmental pollution has been still a controversial issue. From my point of view, I wholeheartedly believe that this statement is awfully wrong headed.
At the outset, it is ostensible that this policy is likely to exert a negative impact on the development of the society. When people are forced to spend a huge amount of finance on traveling, this will make it hard for them to find the right balance between their daily expenses. As a result, there is a likelihood that their living standard will get worse. Furthermore, if the petrol price is too high for people to afford, individuals may get angry, and many strike or rebellion will probably take place, which definitely leads to an increase in social evils and leave long lasting effect on the national economy.
Therefore, people especially the authority have to take proactive measures with the aim of tackling this problem as soon as possible. Initially, it is crucial to help people instill the terrible consequences of consuming too much petrol by means of holding workshops, organizations and propagandizing the serious status and effect of traffic jam and pollution. Moreover, the government ought to utilize other renewable resources in the process of producing vehicles, which can protect the environment along with our natural resource.
To sum up, I think there should not be a significant rise in the price of petrol due to the fact that it will worsen the development of our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
In the world today, whether or not there should be a sharp increase in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun strike seems to be countable; consider using: 'many strikes'.
Suggestion: many strikes
... afford, individuals may get angry, and many strike or rebellion will probably take place, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, i think, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98513011152 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86769182261 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613382899628 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7749030122 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.1 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127757588514 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043425336149 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484133865498 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809489594341 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277918863892 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.