Traffic congestion and pollution problems are becoming the real issues that affect people’s daily life especially in the cities. Some suggested that the optimum way of solving these problems is to simply rise the price of petrol. In my opinion, more measures will be required to effectively control the related issues, rather than the said hike price of petrol. Reasons as well relevant examples will be discussed in this essay.
One of the major causes of the traffic and pollution issues is no doubt as the increasing number of the private vehicles. In recent years, the number private vehicle dramatically increases while the road infrastructures such as highways and roads are maintaining a relatively unchanged status. This can easily lead to the traffic congestion and pollution in the population dense areas. Rise in petrol price can minimize the number of vehicles on the road in some ways.
However, reasons lead to traffic and pollution issues are more complicated than just the increase number of private vehicles. Lack of affordable public transportation, poor urban planning and choices of vehicles can all lead to a relief to traffic and pollution. Therefore, multiple measures toward each cause can be applied. For instance, building cheaper, more convenient and faster public transportation with bigger coverage such as subways, monorails and buses. Spreading out one huge major city into several satellite cities is important to release traffic and pollution pressure. It is a best way to encourage people to purchase fuel-economy or electric cars.
In conclusion, growing traffic and pollution problems can only be control in some extend by rising fuel prices, but to further reduce or solve the problems, more measures are required. This includes but not limited to build cheaper, faster and more covered public transport, improvement of urban planning and encourage the purchases of new energy cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...each cause can be applied. For instance, building cheaper, more convenient and fa...
^^
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...e traffic and pollution pressure. It is a best way to encourage people to purchas...
^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...on problems can only be control in some extend by rising fuel prices, but to further r...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36842105263 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81467482857 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.807154924 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178888391602 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061025604078 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418429770508 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11360954343 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205398604686 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.