Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the environment has become a more debatable topic in the world. While some believe that citizens cannot do anything to improve conditions in the environment, only the government and large organizations contribute to it. In this essay, I will explain why some people agree with the argument and why I disagree.
To embarks with, when the government launches a policy for nature protection, many large companies accept this law. So, they change their practices and advertise them, due to this, all media promote these types of broadcasts. It has a result in peoples’ thinking, leading to a positive image of their brand on them. For instance, Google advertised its contribution to environmental protection by using electric cars and trucks in its offices and factories. As a result, many people had a clear and positive image of the company. Hence, the more companies advertise their roles in the environment, the more they have popularity.
On the other hand, individuals have a significant role in the environment. If people become more aware of the damages to nature, they will try to protect it. It may lead them to use less natural resources and more renewables, which has a result in the reduction of pollutions. In India, since citizens started to use more electric cars, solar energy, and many alternative renewable sources, nearly 28% of pollutants in the air, water, and land had been declined. Therefore, the more people have an idea about using a less amount of natural sources, the more nature becomes clearer.
In conclusion, although authorities and businesses gave their contribution to the protection of nature, people gave a higher percentage in it. In my words, despite having some contributions by corporate and ruling parties, human beings’ have a more important and bigger role in nature than governments and workplaces.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1926910299 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93505001721 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568106312292 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0348041239 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6875 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0739167423241 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0271112718429 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470113977122 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0557860917712 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587767992143 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.