Influence of human beings on the world’s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of the species and loss of bio-diversity.
What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?
What solutions can you suggest?
In today’s modern society, the impact of humanity takes enormous place in the extinction of some species and shrink in the number of bio-diversity. The main reason for the loss of bio-diversity is a modern advanced human technology. There are numerous solutions, approaches to prevent or decrease the influences of human beings on the world’s ecosystem.
It is obvious that today’s technology is incomparable to the ones, which were used in the last centuries and the energy benefits of this equipment have their own detrimental repercussions on the world's environment and habitats. In the first place, energy is the irreplaceable and paramount part of our amenities, and to produce energy, we have been using such a special power plant and other kinds of factories. Therefore it is inevitable to avert the world from contamination, poisonous waste has been poured into lakes or seas for a long time. Thus all marine habitats have been poisoned and killed by these abandoned materials and in the light of that, they enter a direful situation, which is brought them on the brink of going extinct.
There are two effective solutions to the problem of a significant plummet in the number of species. One way to tackle this is to ensure to get governments agreed to impose some beneficial restrictions on every sing company, which is going to confine them to dispose of the venomous material in certain places where is less likely to have any type of influence on the local species. Another method of dealing with this problem is directly related to every single individual on earth and in this situation, some volunteering groups need to do the best of their ability to heighten the awareness of every person by preparing, striking parties, and enlighten them to avoid using the internal combustion engine.
In conclusion, the adverse effects of humanity on the world are not something that people can be blind to. But on the bright side, it is more likely to solve this problem by putting all our efforts into this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...human beings on the world’s ecosystem. It is obvious that today’s technology is...
^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ir own detrimental repercussions on the worlds environment and habitats. In the first ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...wer plant and other kinds of factories. Therefore it is inevitable to avert the world fro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...red into lakes or seas for a long time. Thus all marine habitats have been poisoned ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ht them on the brink of going extinct. There are two effective solutions to the...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... using the internal combustion engine. In conclusion, the adverse effects of hu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, as for, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99117647059 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81704371534 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579411764706 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.4897479623 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.416666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159628738076 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675518754108 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816600628703 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111424370376 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123554785042 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.