The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The limit of using nonrenewable energy should be implemented throughout the world since issuing by global organizations. I completely agree that this rule would bring many advantages to human life and the environment.
To begin with, there are many disadvantages of consuming petroleum and gas. Firstly, burning fuels releases carbon dioxide and other harmful ingredients. This is one of the main factors of causing the greenhouse effect, consequently, it leads global warning. A lot of impacts would occur followed by increasing temperatures such as rising sea level, melting polar ice sheets. Besides, nonrenewable resources are the top air pollutant. Tons of fossil fuels which were used to create electricity and power for transportation was the significant reason of air pollution. Furthermore, most industrial manufactory directly consumes fossil fuel to produce the heat needed for various stages of production.
In addition to environmental pollution, the restriction of nonrenewable resources brings up many benefits to mortality. It motivates scientists to do more investigations to find new ways to apply other green energy such as solar power, wind, water. When using that kind of sources, factories don't need to pay more attention about air pollution and other wastes. Additionally, in future human being doesn't face with lack of fossil fuel. Because, nuclear energy is considering as an absolute answer to the complicated question relating to clean energy. It can entirely replace the old one source and environmentally friendly.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that authorities of every country on over the world should decline the use of fossil fuels. With this, the earth can get rid of air pollution and other negative effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n using that kind of sources, factories dont need to pay more attention about air po...
^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...es. Additionally, in future human being doesnt face with lack of fossil fuel. Because,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51481481481 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09662411874 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681481481481 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7686368327 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.5882352941 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8823529412 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0723290503755 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.020641880309 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267814888012 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0444699923415 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174768803579 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.