The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce the consumption for fossil fuels such as gas, oil and coal. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement? Give your own opinion.

It is argued that the international community should warn all the countries to reduce the amount of fuel use. I am completely agree with this statement because I believe that it is the major cause of air pollution and there are other source of energy that are cleaner and cheaper.

To begin, excess use of gases and oil, our environment is becoming more dirt and pollute than in the past. Global warming and climate change are the main problem associated with this issue and will make human life difficult to survive. In addition, harmful gases to the atmosphere cause different disease and spread all around the world. As a result, there will be no longer human beings in few decades if we do not concern about such issues. For instance, there are many people suffering from heart related disease because of poor air conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention on such problems and aware all the people not to increase consumption of fuel.

There are many other ways to move the vehicles and industries and make our environment fresh and clean. We can use different source of energy such as solar power, wind power and generators instead of coal, petrol and oil. These kinds of sources are not harmful to the environment and thus by doing so, we can get our blue sky back. For example, developed countries are focusing on electric fuels rather than fossil fuel and improving their health and environment. That’s why, reducing non renewable sources and increasing the modern energy fuel we can keep our atmosphere fresh.

In conclusion, highly consumption of fossil fuel have created serious problems in all countries and it is far better to ensure all the nations to use alternative source of energy and reduce the use of oil and gas.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...the amount of fuel use. I am completely agree with this statement because I believe t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'sources'?
Suggestion: sources
...se of air pollution and there are other source of energy that are cleaner and cheaper....
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...associated with this issue and will make human life difficult to survive. In addi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85382059801 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54630303003 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564784053156 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1578331111 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.357142857 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236740205133 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754634017349 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670658566185 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155948532832 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485407398348 0.056905535591 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.