International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not.
What are your opinions on this?
International tourism has been at the center of debates these days. There are the different attitude toward this issue. While the countless opponent critic of the international tourism, we cannot acknowledge the numerous positive impact of tourism on the global economic issue as well as acquiring knowledge about others cultures.
First and foremost international tourism considered as one of the significant way of obtaining money, hotels and restaurant play a good example here. However, a huge amount of money require for advertising for attracting tourists, it has yet significant profit in attracting them for the monetary incentives. Thus national tourism can bring great profit for a nation.
Furthermore becoming familiar to other cultures is one of the advantages of this issue. Tourists frequently come from the remote area and bring their culture which can be interesting for some children or disadvantaged people who may not afford to go there. Also, tourist can visit historical monument which they just read about them. Thus, national tourism would be beneficial not only for the individual but also for a nation as a larger term.
By analyzing the advantages of national tourism, it is obvious that there is no justification to ban the tourism while there are various benefits which offset the possibility disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing knowledge about others cultures. First and foremost international tourism...
^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...cting them for the monetary incentives. Thus national tourism can bring great profit...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can bring great profit for a nation. Furthermore becoming familiar to other c...
^^
Line 5, column 3, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...n bring great profit for a nation. Furthermore becoming familiar to other cultures is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also for a nation as a larger term. By analyzing the advantages of national ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 210.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41904761905 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95999019426 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.661904761905 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9260283066 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.454545455 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149212220176 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061125964315 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475620880225 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969687428215 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611973180339 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.