It is believed that people who read a lot of novels have developed better imagination and language skills than people who prefer to watch TV.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been argued that novel readers’ creativity and linguistic competence are far more stimultated than television viewers’. From the personal perspective, I totally agree with the opinion for the two following reasons.
The first reason is that people reading novels are proved to have more innovative and original thinking than those watching television. This is because novels, be they fiction or non-fiction, introduce readers to a diversity of topics, concepts, experiences and behaviors that they have never encountered in their own lives before. In contrast, since television programs are entertainment-oriented and centered on uneducational and marketable topics such as celebrity gossips, singing competitions or, viewers in no way can be opened up to new ideas as much as novel readers.
In addition, individuals enjoying novels frequently are more lingustically developed than those watching television in vocalurary usage terms. Specifically, novels allow people to be exposed to a wide range of vocabularies and language expressions employed by expert authors and linguistists, thereby widening readers’ vocabulary range in the long term. However, by only watching television, people may have limited and even improper vocabularies since television producers and screenwriters only use words intelligible to the general public. Furthermore, for the purposes of attracting more ratings, television programs feature profanities and slangs from time to time, which are not consistent with the standard language and even public decency.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that novel readers are more stimulated creatively and lingustically than people desiring to watch TV. The arguments are that the former could have fresher thoughts and wider vocabulary range than the latter. Given the situation, it seems that people regardless of age should spend more time reading novels more regularly and less time watching useless television programs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ters only use words intelligible to the general public. Furthermore, for the purposes of attra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84375 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19554442112 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618055555556 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2162457575 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212867721215 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852211367741 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662049998421 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129555543731 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527627556737 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.