It is better to eat food which is produced locally by small farmers rather than food produced by factory farming and transported long distances To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

It is better to eat food which is produced locally by small farmers, rather than food produced by “factory farming” and transported long distances. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is sometimes argued that food which is produced lively from farmers is healthier than food is made by factories. While I strongly agree with eating food from farmers is much better, I do believe that food is not made by progressed technology may also harmful.

To embark on, the production which is directly provided by small farmers have higher quality. The first benefit is local people do not often use chemicals such as the grow-up pill, pesticides and so on because only factories need to sell with a huge amount of food in a short time. Therefore, there is no appearance of other chemicals in home-made food. The second benefit is that local food is often more nutritious since it’s not shipped long distances, locally grown food is often tasty and healthy.

However, these aforementioned reasons can be seen as the opposite angle. Firstly, due to the advanced technology, food is checked tactfully. As a result, people will set their mind at rest before exporting and receiving "factory farming" foods they test them on safety and check for freshness. Secondly, the main benefit of factory farms is that they produce a big amount of meat products so that they reduce food shortages. Moreover, intensive agriculture tends to produce food that can be sold at lower costs to consumers.

In conclusion, while eating local food is being considered by most of the people, “factory farming” products also have their own benefits.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (18 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09543568465 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79200392081 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618257261411 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3082345369 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409228762092 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136328857695 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765606526143 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241509057062 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168175542193 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.