It is better for young to get advice from old people than young people. Do you agree or disagree?
Most youngers nowadays need to be guided more than the past due to the fast change of lifestyle. However, the process of giving advice is an argumentative issue. Some people believe that the older is in priority to advise youngers while several people disagree about the efficiency of those elders` advice. In my opinion, who gives advice is not the matter inherently, but it should be considered more the way of giving that to have a strong impact.
As a matter of fact, the youngsters have a lot of dreams which may think to reach immediately. Sometimes, they become too hasty to decide without considering the consequences. On the other hand, maybe their decision affects the whole following life and even also the family. This can be considered why they need to be cared for and advised to pass this important period to make a promising future. But, the most challenging part is that who can do this advice the best.
It is obvious that the older are more sophisticated and experienced than everyone else and they are at the first rank to give advice. Whereas, on the contrary, a couple of people criticize this idea and believe that experience is not the whole thing for giving effective guidance. They argue that experience requires to be companied by mutual understanding. In other words, youngsters are more impressed by their coevals rather than the others. They argue, that the best way for parents to make effective advice is indirectly and by a friend's child.
To sum up, an experienced person is not sufficient to give a piece of advice. I urge that the method of guidance is should be considered carefully to bring the most effective outcomes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'friends'' or 'friend's'?
Suggestion: friends'; friend's
...effective advice is indirectly and by a friends child. To sum up, an experienced pers...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...ice. I urge that the method of guidance is should be considered carefully to bring...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, whereas, while, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, in other words, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83216783217 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73224398991 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0173555331 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.375 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123208601623 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379600308396 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425606793871 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692087219398 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508409033111 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.