It has been believed that people who read for pleasure have developed imagination and language skills better than people who prefer to watch TV. To what extent, do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Literacy is crucial for all of humans and reading can bring more benefits than watching television, I completely agree with this statement. In this essay, I will discuss some reasons which will support my opinion on both individuals and society.
On the one hand, personal behaviour and imagination ability might change when people prefer to read. For example, humans can train our mind and maintain their concentration by books which involve something such as economy and policy. In reality, elderly people might suffer from alzheimer’s association, and that problem can be solved when they read regularly. On the other hand, reading not only build up mental strength but also develop social communication skills. In addition, the more people read, the better they speak. In particular, both vocabulary and grammar will be improved or people can gain experiences through books’ situations in order to avoid mistakes in society.
By contrast, although watching television affect positively people’s life, it is not as good as reading. For instance, it is better to read well-known Harry Potter book series of JK Rowling than see their films because people can imagine themselves all characters or stories. Moreover, most movies have informal languages, so people cannot improve their academic vocabulary. Furthermore, humans’communication might be difficult because these languages cannot be used in a formal letter as well as an essential meeting.
For the reasons mentioned above, I tend toward the viewpoint that people can have more creation in their thoughts and language skills when they read. The most important thing is that reading is looking pretty good compared to watching.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in particular, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50378787879 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04347280238 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651515151515 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4316732155 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.785714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257370275234 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895319634792 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056002963432 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1560003524 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00222239229711 0.056905535591 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.