Society is a diverse place, and nowadays there are so many children who possess different talents and come from various backgrounds. The question is, is it necessary for them to communicate frequently at âcdemic centers? In my personal opinion, I would totally say yes.
First of all, children are often curious, which somewhat enhances their learning abilities. Letting them communicate with others their age with various origins and talents will encourage them to learn from one another, thus gaining more knowledge from a very early stage of their lives. As they try to understand each other and their differences, children could also learn to respect people around them as well. Overall, being with others their age often can help children broaden their knowledge and understand varieties.
Secondly, as stated from the beginning, society is a diverse place. The sooner children are familiar with this, the better they can adapt to the outside world as they continue to grow. The fact that schools are usually viewed as "a mini version of society" proves that children, regardless of social backgrounds, can have a wide range of abilities and no one should judge them based on the differences they possess. And when these children are mixed, they will soon realize that there are other people who are distinguished from them. Schools should be able to use this chance to teach about equality as well, to ensure that discrimination among children disappear, and as a result, create a better learning environment.
In summary, bringing children who vary in origins and abilities together at school can enhance their learning chances and educate them about the world's diversity from a very young age, which will result in less discrimination among society in a foreseeable future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...te frequently at âcdemic centers? In my personal opinion, I would totally say yes. First of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ning chances and educate them about the worlds diversity from a very young age, which ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in summary, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67705151351 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57785467128 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8507201053 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.384615385 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210806647034 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729992838971 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379806296853 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120077483497 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469234381136 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.