It is widely believed that the way to deal with uncertainty happened in life by taking risks is crutial for people's development. In my perspective, that state might not be true in particular circumstances, it depends on the challenges they are facing. This essay will discuss about the pros and cons of taking risks, and decide whether it is significant for people lives.
On the one hand, everytime people throw a dice and unheraled results come, they will learn a lesson. That is the way people gain experiences, in the professional life and personal life, too. For instance, people in the prehistoric time, did not comprehend the danger of fire until they got burnt when trying to play with it. Moreover, taking risks trains people through the ups and downs in life and in result, those who experience challenges more will be the less vulnerable one when difficulty comes.
On the other hand, as I've mentioned above, dealing with uncertainty in a direct way always leaves a lesson. And if the lesson results in detrimental consequences, it might haunt people for the rest of their life, and make them be unable to facing problems that happened. Take the example of gambling, people might lose everything when they gamble, and when that happens, those people are the last people that want to take risks again.
In conclusion, there is no a certain way to choose when it comes to dealing with challenges. Whether what the solutions are, people should consider a question: does advantages worth enough for them to suffer from disadvantages that solution might cause?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: DIE_DICE[1]
Message: 'die' is the singular form of 'dice'. Consider using 'die'?
Suggestion: die
... the one hand, everytime people throw a dice and unheraled results come, they will l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...ifficulty comes. On the other hand, as Ive mentioned above, dealing with uncertain...
^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a direct way" with adverb for "direct"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ntioned above, dealing with uncertainty in a direct way always leaves a lesson. And if the less...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...e risks again. In conclusion, there is no a certain way to choose when it comes t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92452830189 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67867121142 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8222522059 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.75 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224071378007 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079887731272 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642291415266 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138871143124 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428636475447 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.