It is inevitable that as technology develops so traditional cultures must be lost. Technology and tradition are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Advancement in technology has its own perks and downhill. Though, it has made our lives easier, it has harmed the aesthetics of traditions to an extent. This essay will discuss few points in favour and few in disagreement of the fact that technology would vanish traditional culture; therefore, suggesting a solution for both to co-exist.
To begin with many traditional board games, such as ludo, and, snake and ladder which used to bring the family together at nights, are slowly disappearing. Instead, people now, prefer to play these games online, remotely connecting to each other. Even outdoor games such as soccer and cricket, hockey, table-tennis and tennis are played indoors, with a joystick in hand; losing the value of these games, which were meant to be played in person, promoting good health and the culture of getting together. Therefore, it is likely to say that the culture of getting together is diminishing.
However, on the flipside, technology has brought many people to celebrate their rooted festivals during the time of pandemic. For instance, zoom calls have brought people together virtually, to cherish Diwali; hence, it can be said that, utilizing technology can help maintain the traditions.
Having analysed the pros and cons of Technology, it can be suffice to say that; though, it endangers the traditional culture in few ways, in order for them to work together, it can be suggested that, if used in the right manner it can work the other way out; therefore, saving traditional cultures from getting extinct.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional culture in few ways, in order for them to work together, it can be suggest...
^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work together, it can be suggested that, if used in the right manner it can work ...
^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ork the other way out; therefore, saving traditional cultures from getting extinc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15873015873 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72764280531 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.1934972078 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19244783863 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708935402889 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378613685321 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11354326904 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042545871654 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.