It is inevitable that as technology develops so traditional cultures must be lost. Technology and tradition are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Advancement in technology has its own perks and downhill. Though, it has made our lives easier, it has harmed the aesthetics of traditions to an extent. This essay will discuss few points in favour and few in disagreement of the fact that technology would vanish traditional culture; therefore, suggesting a solution for both to co-exist.
To begin with, India as a country is known for its cultural games and traditional events. Most of them are now forgotten by the present generation due to the introduction of new technological devices. For instance, flying kites during the windy month of September is a traditional game, played in Gujarat. This culture makes family and friends spend quality time together. However, today this habit is slowly disappearing. Instead, people now, prefer to play these games online, remotely connecting to each other. Thus, one can say that the culture is slowly forgotten.
However, on the flipside, technology is a boon in the surviving of many traditions. For example, zoom calls were heavily used during the traditional festival of Diwali. It virtually brought people together to celebrate their rooted festival during the time of pandemic; hence, it can be said that, the virtual calls saved the tradition of Diwali from being missed.
Having analysed the pros and cons of the Technological world, it can be suffice to say that technology is likely to endanger the traditional culture. Nevertheless, it can be suggested that, if used in the right manner, technology can help in traditional cultures from getting extinct.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23412698413 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88416181807 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3796675362 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272465416284 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862801090112 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580924224312 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170527196967 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544903237841 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.