It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
As technology has developed, people can now visit travel to remote natural areas. Despite some obvious advantages of this trend, I believe that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are a number of major benefits when visiting isolated natural places. The first fros is scientists travelling to remote areas have the opportunity to find chemicals or living organisms that have never been discovered before. This could lead to major scientific breakthroughs such as a cure for fatal diseases like cancer and AIDS. The seemd benefit is the development of tourism in isolated place can help create more job opportunities for local people, improving their living standard. For example, many local residents could become tour guides or work in hotels and restaurants.
On the other hand, I believe that the drawbacks are more significant than such advantages. Firstly, a trip to remote region could involve great risks such as hostile weather conditions or attacks carried out by isolated tribes. This is because that many tourists and researchers have been reported to have been attacked by uncontacted Amazonian tribes. Secondly, the development of tourism in isolated region could be pose a serious threat to the environment and the people living there. Solid waste and littering, for example, could contaminate streams, lakes, rivers and oceans, detrimental both to te aquatic ecosystem and local people's health. Another negative effect is the contruction of tourist facilities such as hotels and restaurants could destroy natural habitats, threatening wild animals.
In conclusion, I would argue that researchers and tourists to travel to isolated natutral region brings more drawbacks that benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 604, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ides or work in hotels and restaurants. On the other hand, I believe that the dr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cause that many tourists and researchers have been reported to have been attacked...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46268656716 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80577166653 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8439367228 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242909325686 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758319944516 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397615572512 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146052978198 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558891182605 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.