It is often argued that children must be protected from unsuitable material on TV and the Internet by government censorship. Others say that this is the parents' responsibility to control what their children do and watch. To what extent do you think that this is true?
Nowadays, television and the Internet have become an essential part of life providing people with unlimited information and programs which may not be right for all ages, especially children. Whether it is the responsibility of parents or the government to avoid children being exposed to such material has always aroused a controversy.
The government has the authority to severely control the programs on television as well as the content of the websites. Governmental officials are allowed to assign some expert producers in television industry who are educated professionally to distinguish which programs are suitable for children. They can observe the TV programs’ schedule thoroughly to let inappropriate TV series or programs be broadcasted later at night when children are asleep. This, consequently, prevents children viewing unfavorable programs. Moreover, the authorities can set some regulations on access to the websites. For instance, they can introduce children SIM cards to the market, allowing children to use the Internet via their cellphones for just some educational and entertaining websites. In this way, children are able to benefit from the Internet without being disturbed by improper materials.
Parents, on the other hand, can play a pivotal role too. Having a close relationship with their children, parents are capable of offering some alternative programs, keeping children away from television and the Internet for some time. Going to playgrounds, doing some sports, and attending some entertaining classes are all substitutions which are more beneficial for children. Furthermore, parents are able to advise and convince their children on the adverse effects of some undesirable programs, as they know their own children better than others. Mothers and fathers can manage their children in a way that they become reluctant to inadequate material on TV or the Internet.
All in all, considering the potentials of both parents and the government to address the issue, I, for one, opine that they can optimally control the exposure of the children to improper material by joining their hands and trying to make their individual contributions properly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55988023952 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08224044722 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7392201463 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276743717201 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104395783913 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547840863271 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176897153148 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317051992245 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.