Nowadays, shopping malls become one the most highly debatable topics in the world. Some people believe that large malls replacing small shops, which create a positive impact, while others think that it has many disadvantages. In this essay, I will explain both advantages and disadvantages of large smalls and why I think that it will create a negative development.
To embarks with, when large-sized malls replaced small shops, people find all things as per their needs easier in one place. This is resulting in the reduction of traffic on roads and accidents. For instance, nearly 85% of shops in the town of Anand in India were, demolished and constructed into a big mall in 2018, as a result, people now required less time for buying clothes, groceries, and many household items, as well as traffic and related problems on roads, decreased by 56%. Therefore, the fewer smalls shops, the less time needed for shopping and less traffic on roads.
On the other hand, others and I, however, believe that if all small businesses are converted or replaced by big ones, local people lost their employment because all shops in big malls always required training, and they hire as per their needs. Shopkeepers of small shops cannot afford the rent of big shops in a mall. This may lead them to shut down their business. In China, for example, in 2018, nearly 70 mega malls replaced more than 800 shops, leading more than 10, 0000 workers to lose their jobs. Hence, the more malls replace small shops, the more people become unemployed due to rents.
In conclusion, although people find it easier in terms of shopping since they found all things in one place, it increases many obstacles for small business owners and the unemployment rate. In my words, despite having many advantages of large malls, their demerits are superior. It will create negative consequences for authorities and human beings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96865203762 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50296548796 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548589341693 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2509035578 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32302885693 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113439732823 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834749761514 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208020170477 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832414770595 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.