Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

History cannot be changed. Moreover, it represents the cultural as well as traditional values of a nation. I tend to agree with the proposal that we cannot use the history in our present lives as history has no implimentation towards our present lives. In this essay I will try to highlight some factores and try to provide sound reasoning for my claims.

First and foremost, history cannot guide us for our daily work. In other words, although we can learn about the ancient world with the help of our history books, in order to be successful in our work, we cannot focus on the history. For instance, people, who are living on the present, can learn about the World War I and World War II through history books, they cannot impliment these knowlege in their recent lives because, they are busy to solve their daily problems. Hence, historical knowlege has no value in our present lives.

Moreover, world has shifted from conservative mindset to open mindset. People nowadays do not believe everything, which they have informed. For example, while old Indians believed in dowry system during their marriage, young generation finds it redundant and they are more open minded about their marriage. Thus, in my point of view, we can ignore the historical mindset from our present lives.

However, we can learn some key values such as leadership from the history. I would like to cite an example. Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King were the pioneer of freedom fighter and they were indeed a great leader. So, we can learn the leadership qualities from them and impliment those features in our new creative present ideas.

To conclue, I would like to reiterate my opinion by saying that although new leaders can be guided by the history, we cannot find the historical values helpful in order to mitigate our daily problems. Therefore, we should focus on the present.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91482649842 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46947751944 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536277602524 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.5034352168 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5555555556 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172094530423 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544891508084 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451185091281 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949751080709 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463363781537 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.