Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, society was improved with the help of technology. A section of the community argues that studying history is a waste of the time although we can not go back to history. I totally concur with this statement and believe that we learn everything from history.
To begin that our forefathers developed many which today is based on each thing which we are using. If we forget our history and do not give any importance then first each thing we are consuming today, need to leave it. For example, most scientific laws are an essential component of each innovation, first, we should forget these laws and then make our own system. Our lives will be reached thousand years ago at stone age. In addition, most of history teach us a lesson.
Secondly, most of the time our worlds in war situations that teaches us about humanities. If we leave our memories and future generation nothing take the lesson. For instance, imagine that we do not know about history based on the present knowledge our world go forward. After years, we do not know about wars and start to control others, it means again we will the same situation which we are hundred years ago. Moreover, we have some mysteries to solve it which need both also need future and prehistoric information than what we do. our life similar to a staircase which needs both sides to deliver his main purpose.
In conclusion, our whole knowledge is based on history and if we need to continue our progress then we history
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...r own system. Our lives will be reached thousand years ago at stone age. In addition, mo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70384615385 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47490063156 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9654199962 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.5333333333 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0863538986367 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353979667004 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400635339978 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0451995269879 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410068654477 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.