Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Probably due to the significant advance of technology and serious alternations in social interactions, there are people who argue that learning about History is no longer impactful towards contemporary society. I strongly advocate the perspective of disagreement based on the following reasons.
Firstly, the past is genuinely what makes the present. There is no doubt that the actions implemented in the past are what bring the consequences to the current situations. By studying History, the individuals will have a chance to analyze the past events and re-evaluate the past responses, which will help them to decide the most optimal approach if they encounter a similar problem or to prevent identical tragic outcomes. For instance, the United Nations which is well-known for its activities that bring prosperity to people globally is inspired by the League of Nations resulting from the treaty of Versailles. However, the organization paid great attention to its purpose and actions to stay neutral and unbiased, since History showed the outbreak of World War II due to unfairness in the treaty itself and the League of Nations. Therefore, people living today must be aware of the past because the past not only shows our gruesome mistakes but also depicts our unsophisticated approaches to the problems.
Secondly, the majority of technical development or changes in social life for the better is all originated from the attempts of our counterparts in the past. Because the approach did not work out in the past, it does not translate that it is not going to be useful in the present. By renovating the past ideas and improving the past approaches, the present is gifted with more convenient ways of doing things. To cite an instance, some of the hospitals in London are now considering innovating their ventilation systems in the wards based on the hospital designs in the 19th century, since that design can provide more natural and hygienic air for the patients, compared to the air-conditioned rooms. Hence, it is crucial to educate ourselves about the past, since it may have some easter eggs that will bring a positive impact to our current lifestyles.
To conclude, it is natural that people can get overwhelmed by the complexity of current issues which eventually led them to think that learning about past events is not necessarily important. Nonetheless., such opinion should not be convinced as truth, and in fact, should be considered to be eliminated since knowing about History will certainly provide the people the ways, the mechanisms, and the ideas which are so much crucial and beneficial for the well-being of the society and the betterment of the globe as a whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s of doing things. To cite an instance, some of the hospitals in London are now considering...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
...st events is not necessarily important. Nonetheless., such opinion should not be convinced ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in fact, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 41.998997996 176% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 440.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89308094518 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531818181818 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8406479927 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.666666667 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161580737344 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584645890086 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355739290829 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908521945489 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330497576464 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.