Learning to play team sports is an important part of a child’s education.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
Nowadays, young children are encouraged to play sports in group. This development is considered vital for the progressive growth of the new generation. It is agreed that education of cohesion and integration is the important program in the curriculum of pupils. This will be proven by analyzing the sense of responsibility and amicable relation with peers in the modern society.
Firstly, it is believed that having fun in the squad will make successors to feel accountable in the practical life. This is because unity in sports shared the feelings of responsible person. For example, a research conducted by the Royal Institute of London has shown that school going young ones have serious and answerable role in the group due to the presence of the team spirit in the learning institutes. This example shows that newcomers are taking ownership as active partners in all the activities conducted in schools. Thus, it is now understandable that authoritarian ship is important for progressive growth.
In addition, off springs have friendly and compatible link due to the presence of team in recreational tasks. Take Chine as an example. New generation in this country consider their friends as blood relations and often they sleep in their friend’s home at night with any hesitation. This makes obvious that strong brotherly bond is present in the acquaintance of small children. Consequently, giving lectures on the amalgamation has fruitful results in the contemporary world.
To sum up, after analyzing the consequences of synchronization in kids, it can be concluded that tutoring on alliance has positive ramifications. It is recommended that intelligentsia should enlighten the importance of working in the group.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35661764706 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18230120853 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8820234792 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0625 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121512189654 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359352656407 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269723714765 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636628189738 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273835316204 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.