As major cities in the world are growing today, so do their problems. What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth? How problems might be solved?
Large metropolises have been shown with speedy developments recently, bringing new sets of issues along with it, which are tremendous especially for young adolescents staying in these places. Possibily, these people may have to deal with a host of challenges related to the environment and career prospects, which might only be tackled by greater attention to the rural areas from both governments and entreupreneurs
Living in a fast-growing land can pose some threats to one’s health and future due to the intense pollution and high competitiveness in job application. To provide enough materials for their industries, many cities do not mind exploiting their natural resources as well as a huge amount of energy is needed to run thousands of factories and buldings, which may lead to more natural disasters and pollition, directly endagering the inhabitants. Also, with the increasing number of migrants flocking to the urban areas every year for higher living standards, this may lower the employment chance of young people living in the cities since they have to compete with more and more people to land a decent job
Those problems, however, could be avoided if the authorities and companies paid more attention to the villages and balance the employment rates between cities and countrysides. The labor forces in the rural areas are often looked down on due to their minimal salary and living standards, causing villagers to migrate to big cities for more well-paid occupations. As a result, if villages are granted with equal career prospects and income, fewer people will have to move to the urban areas, thus, slowing the rising pace of cities
To conclude, although living in metropolitan areas can be life-changing, this also brings many shortcomings to the young adolescents living in those places regarding their healths and future careers. Nonetheless, this can be prevented if more governments and bussinesses thoroughly take rural areas into consideration
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, thus, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32907348243 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93495303378 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571884984026 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 20.2975951904 217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.041452087 49.4020404114 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 238.285714286 106.682146367 223% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.7142857143 20.7667163134 215% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.2857142857 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184520710142 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852103096512 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407140766964 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108203686927 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038597479044 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.0 13.0946893788 199% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.82 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 11.3001002004 181% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.1190380762 194% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.