In many cities, an increasing number of people do not know their neighbours and the sense of community is lost. Discuss the causes and give measures to turn it around.
Many city dwellers claim that social communication is a big problem to them as they can barely create conversations with their neighbors within their living areas. There are a number of reasons leading to this, thus some solutions should be considered to alleviate it.
To begin with, one root cause for barriers between neighbors could involve the high pressure from higher living standard in big cities as a result of globalization. Workers or even employers have to strengthen their workplace commitment to secure a stable income or maintain their businesses. By doing this, they have little chance to socialize with friends living next door since many jobs, factory workers for instance, require to work overtime. In addition, the dominant role of technology in everyone's lives has many influences on the way people spend their time for recreational activities. Instead of participating in voluntary work organized by the local authority, they stay indoor after work to watch TV or play online games. This behavior, in fact, is widely popular among office workers, teachers and even students.
Therefore, measures should be taken to address this challenge as soon as possible. First, government spending should be allocated for education, specifically community courses to engage citizens to attend field trips. This way, not only do people earn more real-life experience, but they are also able to be exposed to different people with various personalities. Their common interests and passions will contribute to building their bonding. Moreover, big companies could bring a new perspective to their customers by launching advertisement campaigns disseminating information relating to fostering soft skills. Given such condition, it allows people to eradicate their fear to express their individuality in public.
In conclusion, although the reasons for the loss of community connection are problematic, everyone is encouraged to stand together as a force to overcome any obstacles and build a stronger community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'working'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: working
..., factory workers for instance, require to work overtime. In addition, the dominant rol...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54516129032 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97381041546 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68064516129 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.155851947 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.6 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154137332194 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049200001852 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318549421901 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837387458607 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381893114425 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.