many claim that the fast food industry had a negative effect on the environment eating habits and families To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

many claim that the fast food industry had a negative effect on the environment, eating habits and families. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Nowadays people's eating habit has undergone significant changes compared to past due to the hectic life style, advancements in technology and money status. There are people worrying about these changes, and claiming these will bring detrimental impacts on eating habit, enviroment and families. There are convincing reasons which make me favor of this assertion, and I compeletly agree with this idea.

To begin with, individuals had have different eating habits in past, and due to the huge workload and long working hours, they had to adopt a new way of living. For instance, they used to have meals on a regular basis including breakfast, dinner, lunch and healthy snacks, but now because of the shortage of time, they do not have a proper plan for eating, and cannot eat home made food. Consequently, healthy food is being replaced by junk food since it is more time-saving and convenient. There are serious consequences regarding this replacement for families as well as people. First of all, the lack of nutritous ingredients will give rise to problems associated with health of the family and nation such as lack of vitamins and cancer. Secondly, the high amount of fat, sugar and salt, which are the main ingredients of fast foods, can lead to high blood pressure, obesity and heart diseases for individuals and families.

Furthermore, the negative effects of fast food on enviroment are by no means negligible. Regarding the statistics provided by enviromentalists, fast foods are more harmful for enviroment than any sort of food. To elaborate more, dozens of human labour, energy and natural resources are required to produce a meal junk food which can harm enviroment in numerous ways such as leaving wastes, water pollution and depletion of resources, whereas organic foods come from nature, and have no harm to enviroment.

In conclusion, some people concern that with the growth of using junk foods all around the world, the problems associated with habits, enviroment and families are unavoidable, and there are some compelling reasons such as depletion of resources and health problems which make me believe that this assertion is true.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (4 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...idea. To begin with, individuals had have different eating habits in past, and du...
^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...iduals had have different eating habits in past, and due to the huge workload and long ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, such as, as well as, first of all, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75762246014 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582857142857 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.0293713729 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.461538462 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6153846154 7.06120827912 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188948263322 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689221905776 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446726183249 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100401847679 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362541943108 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.