In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. SOme people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years. But other people think everyone should have the freedom to choose where they work.

The well-etablished academic and health care system are one of the key contributing factors to the rural-urban shift. Many people argue for legislation compelling teachers and doctors to spend several years to serve in rural areas. While others argue that it is an individual right in the choice of occupation and place of work. This essay discusses various aspects related to these two issues and arrived at it own conclusion.
To begin with, as citizens, villagers have their own rights as much as suburbanites have, and this deserve consideration.Giving them proper education and health care is the responsibility of governments. Only if they get good education ano health care, can a country achieve real progress. Development of rural areas is necessary for the overall progress of a country.
However, those teachers and doctors prefer to work in cities because they get better wages and other facilities is a well-known fact. Choosing an occupation is an individual right. He or she has the right to choose the place of work. This means that governments cannot compel people to work at places where they do not want to work.
Notwithstanding the above, governments can address the shortage of teachers and doctors in the villages in many ways. A useful example is offering scholarships to students on condition that as qualified teachers and doctors, they will spend a specific number of years for the service of rural communities.
To conclude, I believe that young teachers and doctors should be sent to rural places for the sake of the personal prospects. However, we shall not forget that the final choice is given to them.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Giving
...es have, and this deserve consideration.Giving them proper education and health care i...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07037037037 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97056663247 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581481481481 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2050023365 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278837815258 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846067080962 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597114069637 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137765475256 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500593979226 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.