In many countries, government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money?
It is believed that public spending is currently spent much on enhancing the quality of Internet access in many parts of the world. This happens for some reasons, and I do not think it is the best use of government budget.
To begin with, there are several reasons why the authorities invest a great amount of money in accessing the Internet. The first one is that improving provides better education for students. Since in this modern world, most university students tend to look up information and collect materials online on a regular basis, having the stable and fast internet allows both students and teachers to learn and teach in more effectively ways. The quality of the future workforce therefore can be improved with well-educated citizens later on. Additionally, the Internet today also involves greatly in international business such as online meetings and contracts signed indirectly between different countries, making it very necessary for companies to have access to the Internet. As companies could earn higher profit, they would pay greater taxes to the government. This may lead to a contribution to the economy as a whole.
However, I believe that public expenditure should be spent on other key fields like health care and environment rather than the Internet accessing. Firstly, there is an increasing level of noise and exhausted fumes caused by private vehicles, more money needs to be used to encourage people to use public transport in order to prevent seriously environmental pollution happening around the world. This could be done by running individuals’ awareness of problems related to the environment. Secondly, it is advisable for the authorities to pay much attention to health care improvements by investing government expenditure for scientists, because carrying out better research enables them to come up with better ways to deal with dangerous diseases, including cancer and heart attack.
In conclusion, there are reasonable reasons behind spending a large amount money on the Internet accessing of the government, I suppose that it is certainly not the most effective way of using money.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3215339233 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94053395396 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607669616519 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.5799461474 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.857142857 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310069642396 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903480874211 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892687437181 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20310676932 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729496471362 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.