In many countries, government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why it is happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money?
Government investment in Internet improvement constitutes a large chunk of national budget, sparking public controversy in recent years. Despite the benefits bestowed, this is not the most beneficial ways to spend government money
There are many reasons why official authorities spend money on internet accessability. From economical perspective, Higher degree of internet access could be conducive to online trade and online economic co-operations among local companies and foreign ones. This would feed into the increase in oursourcing investment activities in the country, boosting economic development. From the educational perspective, due to better internet accessibility, young individuals, especially those residing in mountainmous or poverty-stricken regions could get easier access to learning materials from online courses without any physical travels to educational institutions. For example, many Internet service providers in Vietnam have installed Internet broadband transmitters in many mountainous provinces, uplifting the literacy rate in these areas to near 98%.
Nonetheless, governments are recommended to spend budget on other public sectors other than Internet access improvement. First, Higher disbursements should be poured on updating public infrastructure. For example, if many transportation facilities such as highway roads or bridges are reinforced and installed, not only car accident rate will diminish but also economy will develop thanks to the ease of goods delivery. Second, governments can raise capital injections into research on technological advancements. For instance, budget spending on automation in manufacture factories lead to the causal relationship with the betterment in products’ quality and quantity, saving a great amount of money in comparison with human laborers.
In conclusion, I believe that governments should not spend much national budget on improving Internet access. Additionally, official authorities can invest in public infrastructure and technological research for better social development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nonetheless, second, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.30281690141 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36966495903 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644366197183 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6499331561 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.692307692 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242815583149 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821765092415 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080560056185 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157382138866 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573483860625 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.32 50.2224549098 32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.26 12.4159519038 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.