In many countries, government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money?
In digital age nowadays, internet networking has become widespread over the world. In many nations, authorities are more and more concentrating on developing it. There are various reasons behind this case. However, I personally suppose that many other things are high on the agenda.
On the one hand, it is certainly true that internet access brings out a lot of benefits to people’s lives. First of all, due to the incredible achievements of the internet, life seems to be easier than ever. Many services, agencies, organisations could take advantages on virtual world that was created by internet. For example, It is worth noting shopping online, the one that has considerably changed the people’s shopping habit. Secondly, Internet today is considered as an important tool which is human basic need. In stead of waiting a long time for a letter from overseas in the past, today, via social media such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, no matters how distant they are, they still have ability to keep in touch with each other.
On the other hand, a fact that there are a variety of other thought-provoking concerns which the governments must deal with those first, especially environmental problems. This is one of the most dangerous menaces that should be a government priority. They should tighten the restrictions on protecting environment. For example, national authorities must get companies, factories which discharged industrial waste into rivers, the atmosphere held accountable for their actions. Furthermore, another thing that should be prioritized expenditure on is to fight climate change. They could provide public subsides for taking action on global warming as well as campaign for raising public awareness about the green movement because environmental issues might be a key factor influencing significant our lives that can lead not only animals but also humans on the brink of extinction.
In conclusion, Although I accept that internet access play an important role in the society thank to its unique advantages, I still believe that there are issues outside which need to be received more government sponsorship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 530, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Instead of'?
Suggestion: Instead of
...portant tool which is human basic need. In stead of waiting a long time for a letter from o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, another thing, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36390532544 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9900588648 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647928994083 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7056523735 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.647058824 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2352941176 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993159749576 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323991366826 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034143781028 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063607984219 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167395672845 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.