In many countries, people now wear Western clothes (suits, jeans) rather than traditional clothing. Why? Is this a positive or negative development?
Western clothes have been in demand in recent decades especially in eastern nations, raising many questions of the preservation of traditional values. Given that this trend could result from many social dimensions, it brings positive changes overall.
There are many reasons behind this pattern. First, the increased globalization has
boosted trade deals and negotiations between nations worldwide. This means that western clothes could be easily injected into many foreign markets, leading to the higher consumption. Second, since garment manufacturing companies in the west usually capitalize on cheap labors to produce items, western apparels usually are at reasonable prices. It is implied that these items would be within the affordability of every individuals, including average or low-income individuals.
However, this pattern could bestow net positive benefits. First, Higher demand for western clothes correlates with higher trade practices between nations. This will act as a significant contributor to the affiliated nations’ national revenues, meaning more money for other social services and welfares. In addition, western garments are diverse in choice options and compatible with current fashion trends. In fact, consumers can purchase these items based on personal preferences and fashion tastes without any limitations of models, sizes, functionality or fashionality.
In conclusion, Increased consumption of western clothes could be attributed to the globalization and the reasonable prices. Additionally, this pattern could pay dividends including higher national incomes and the diversity in choice options.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... First, the increased globalization has boosted trade deals and negotiations bet...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...izes, functionality or fashionality. In conclusion, Increased consumption of we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.12987012987 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95650395738 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65367965368 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8129843241 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167542794145 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621476833315 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492326027935 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102914047061 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376257466653 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.98 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.