In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is argued by some that the governments should restrict salaries above a certain level as it is not good for the country. In my opinion however, people with challenging jobs should get high salaries even if they are less in number.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some believe that a small number of people earning very high income is not good for the country. First reason is that the wage gap will increase. If a small number of people hold a large amount of wealth, the poor will not have a chance to rise up the economic ladder. Due to this, only a few people will have monopoly in the market. Another reason whould be increasing friction between rich and poor. People with low salaries will become jealous of a few extremely high payed ones and which may lead to violence and hate crimes in future.
On the other hand, I would argue that it is not right of government to restrict salaries of a few people whose earnings are very high. First reason is that it will demoralize the hardworking employees. Some people may have worked hard throughout their life to reach that high salary and restricting it will reduce the sense of self improvement. Employees will have no incentive to perform better after a certain point of their career. Second reason is that limiting salaries in a certain profession may lead to loss of importance of job. Young talent might not be interested in a certain job as it may come with a lot of responsibilities whereas on the other hand, there might be similar paying jobs with a lot less responsibilities.
To conclude, although some people think that paying a very high salary to a few people might lead to higher wage gap and a increased rift between rich and poor, I personally believe that their salaries should not be restricted as it will demotivate hardworkers and people might lose interest in the job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
...ould get high salaries even if they are less in number. On the one hand, there are a number...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...number of reasons why some believe that a small number of people earning very high income is not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... is that the wage gap will increase. If a small number of people hold a large amount of wealth, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ch may lead to violence and hate crimes in future. On the other hand, I would argue th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eople might lead to higher wage gap and a increased rift between rich and poor, I...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, whereas, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61377245509 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56617568153 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473053892216 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1677474927 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.733333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316660917602 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11732222836 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990177532567 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232918458378 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625752994135 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.