In many countries today, people buy a range of household goods (television, microwave, oven and rice cookers). Is it a positive or negative development?
In recent years, thanks to the outburst of technology, a huge number of household equipment , such as rice cookers, ovens, televisions or microwaves, have been invented which have become an indispensable part of our daily life. From my perspective, although this development may bring about certains both pros to individuals, negative effects could be witnessed for their surrounding environment as well.
Initially, the increasing number of state-of-the-art inventions makes our life more convenient and heightensheighten the living standards. Instead of consuming a huge amount of time for household chores, inhabitants can put more concentration on work and study, or pursue their own passions; therefore, more chances for promotion at work or personal satisfaction could be gained. For example, dishwashers support humans in doing the dishes after meals, or washing machines help users in reducing efforts on clean clothes. As a result, the more time they can save from doing housework, the more money and achievements they can obtain.
On the other hand, producing technological productions are likely to cause adverse impacts on the environment. It is proven that the process of the emerging new devices discharges a significant number of pollutants to the surroundings, not only affecting human health but also gradually leading to serious long-term environmental issues; for instance, the most noticeable problem in recent years is global warming. Besides, technological breakthroughs also result in some people's overdependence on these supplies . In fact, a number of households cannot live independently from automatic gadgets due to the fact that they possess no basic housework skills. Therefore, if these people are put into a situation that is a technology-free situation, they will encounter numerous challenges to adapt to the new changes.
In conclusion, the growth in household equipment consumption has apparently benefited our life apparently; however, its downsides should have to be considered deliberately for the optimal utilization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gy, a huge number of household equipment , such as rice cookers, ovens, television...
^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o gradually leading to serious long-term environmental issues; for instance, the ...
^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...gical breakthroughs also result in some peoples overdependence on these supplies . In f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...peoples overdependence on these supplies . In fact, a number of households cannot ...
^^
Line 5, column 787, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they will encounter numerous challenges to adapt to the new changes. In concl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7328990228 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34250474226 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674267100977 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1684858875 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.666666667 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4166666667 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0708911004897 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237141153968 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241843304811 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0441030741253 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323922392469 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.