Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages.
Food shipping has been capturing significant public attention in recent decades, raising questions of environmental and economical implications. Despite the disadvantages of local food consumption could be pronounced, they are still outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are many benefits when it comes to the usage of local food. From the environmental perspective, local food consumption is invariably associated with the reduced automobile dependency for the importation and transportation of foreign food. Without the heavy flow of traffic for food shipping, the carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere could be minimized, ensuring the environmental sustainability. From the economical perspective, since local food producers would not have to incur the expenses of logistics related to cross-nation shipping fees or customs charges in the case of imported products, which are proved to be prohibitively expensive, the local food costs are relatively low. Consequently, low prices would fall into the affordability of many individuals irrespective of their purchasing powers, guaranteeing food securities on a massive scale.
On the other hand, local food consumption could be fraught with many pitfalls. First, in fact many nations and regions are still grappling with civil warfare stemming from political turmoils and ethnic division. This means that constant fightings and bombings suggest causal relationship with the destruction of local crops, which could not ensure the stable local food supply, making citizens resort to foreign food shipping. In addition, due to the peculiar characteristics of soil in different local areas, only specific food could strive containing specific types of nutrition. In order to ensure the adequate amount of nutrition, people have to search for food supply from other regions, leading to various food options and ample nutrition intake in consumers.
In conclusion, local food consumption could offer many environmental and economical benefits despite the controversy of unstable food supply. However, with better governmental administration and genetic modification of local food, these problems could easily be addressed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to contain'.
Suggestion: to contain
... areas, only specific food could strive containing specific types of nutrition. In order t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mple nutrition intake in consumers. In conclusion, local food consumption coul...
^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...tion could offer many environmental and economical benefits despite the controversy of uns...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.884375 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21106333391 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5706865795 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291850778156 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121947838367 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431165724772 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201025407895 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244606185035 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.