Many government think that economy progress is their most important goal. Some people think that other types of progress are equally important.
It’s not so hard to see here that nowadays, the world get more and more complex. So, it’s really important for not only people, but also countries, to get better to develop at a multi subject, not just economy.
Actually, there will be some really big change in the world. Russia just rushing into Ucraina, despite of the punishment from the Western and the USA. The recovery of the after virus attacking is still getting slow but steady. In the case of that, to survive, a country must be fairly goes up at every single stat, to prepare about what will come, since none of us has a seer pearl to see or alter the future. What is the point of economic if the keep is not well protected? That is no difference about turning into a delicious goods for anyone. And if trading is bad, how can you goes up in income when you have to homemade the ingredient that you know you are not good into, while others just have to buy it from the one that is good at it. And that is only a drop of a sea if you underestimate anything else but money.
It’s not good to only increase the income rate, it’s still a crucial part in a country. Really bad if a country ignore it, and get poorer, and it’s will pull most if not all another part down. Most problem now will have to be sold for a cost, and money is a great assistant to be a number to count it. If you don’t have enough, you could be in problem. So, economical should be going, as long as the great minister or president don’t forget the others.
To end this, money is not more than a convienient trading system, and the trading is not all. Even though it’s good to making it up, it’s just one in the must-have list.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 528, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'good'?
Suggestion: good
...fference about turning into a delicious goods for anyone. And if trading is bad, how ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, really, so, still, well, while, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.246105919 5.12529762239 83% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19044101756 2.80592935109 78% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529595015576 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4388248077 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1764705882 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82352941176 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0281272947474 0.244688304435 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00864148581819 0.084324248473 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0148727629944 0.0667982634062 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0176103104299 0.151304729494 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01239285598 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.0946893788 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 50.2224549098 156% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.37 12.4159519038 59% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.