Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In this industrialized age, the leaders of all nations are making a great effort to make their territories thrive rapidly. A large proportion of governmental establishments focus on developing their economic targets as the most fundamental business, while the others divide their budget equally to deal with all issues related to human beings. The aim of this essay is to discuss both these perspectives and to support the latter idea as it is similar to my point of view.
The argument for prioritizing economic goals suggests that the standard to evaluate the wealth of a country depends on its financial condition. For example, it is obvious that the USA is the most thriving nation thanks to the highest average income per person and plenty of appropriate economic policies. Another instance which braces this opinion is that with an abundant national budget, it is more convenient to invest money in other aspects such as healthcare and education to upgrade the living quality for citizens.
However, many politicians have argued that there are other crucial factors contributing to the development of a country should not be marginalized by economy goals but need equally investing. Taking Finland as a typical example, it is undeniable that the government there spend money on every aspect including environmental programs, healthcare and education which influence directly on Finnish. Furthermore, the sustainable level of this place also higher than any other parts in the world. There are few social maladies such as terrorism or arms trade. So, the inhabitants can enjoy a peaceful and cosy life.
To reiterate, I gravitate towards the second perspective which supports equal investment on various aspects. I strongly believe that a respectful leader of a great country tends to thrive his territory in the most fulfilled way rather than marginalizing any national issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than marginalizing any national issues.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, second, so, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92183161732 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9359331433 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.538461538 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174759851698 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516799794157 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391208855763 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951526449349 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307444120771 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.