Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women.
To what extent do you agree?
Research on sex discrimination has always been a point of interest both for scientists and ordinary people. Job hiring is ususally the thing to check for discrimination, as it is said that most well-paid and prestigious positions are held by males. However, I do not share the opinion that quotas on the number of men and women in a company are to introduce.
To begin with, in my view, a specialist on human resources or a headhunter is to find the most suitable candidate for a position but not a woman or a man. That is, making them hire depending on the sex of applicants limit their opportunities to choose the most effective and productive worker. Consequently, such state of affairs may lead to lose of profits and effectiveness of production since employees are not the ones truly needed.
In addition, inequal skills and inborn traits of females and males are worth mentioning. As numerous scientific researches show, men are usually better in technical works, while women have advantages in humanitarian spheres. In addition, males are usually considered to be great leaders because of truly “man” traits of character: self-confidence, courage and aility to manage. On the other hand, women are optimal workers: they are usually accurate, calm and responsible. That is why it is better for employers to choose suitable applicants(in terms of personality and abilities) but not on the basis on shares of sexes in a particular company.
All in all, it is evident to me that there is no need in allocating strict percentage of males and females in hiring positions. Employers should not rely on the number of male workers in his production, but on how a person suits the particular work. Choice of employees depending on sex might result in profit and effectivenes costs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, well, while, in addition, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00668896321 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07849676203 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581939799331 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2996857279 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0843905265821 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275649250176 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378673501509 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0495886323396 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296205885406 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.