Nowadays, several types of trade emerge that makes remarkable changes in the world. The fact has shown that recent years have witnessed the demolition of a large number of street stores to make way for other purposes. Then whether this phenomenon brings us merits or demerits has been becoming a controversial issue. This essay shall discuss the reasons for this and the answer to the second question in detail.
In terms of why lots of shops on the street disappeared, there are some reasons as follows. First of all, consumers' routine has been changing dramatically due to the appearance of online shopping. To specify, there are many applications, such as Amazon, Tiki and Shopee, were created for shoppers who have not much time for traditional shopping. These new kinds of buying give clients much more convenience thanks not only for saving time but also for home delivery. Moreover, people tend to go to shopping centres or supermarkets to buy their needed produce. Specifically, small stores along the street always have only one type of goods for sale, so it is difficult for buyers who need a lot of items for their lives. Therefore, instead of going to those places, they will choose bigger ones to meet their needs.
When it comes to the negative and positive sides of this trend, in my opinion, there have drawbacks and benefits as well. On the one hand, many employers have to face the risk of losing their jobs, and some traditional values have gone out. This trend, however, brings about a lot of following advantages. Firstly, it is a chance for all managers to reorganise their business and use modern technologies to increase revenue. Secondly, buyers no longer have to drive on the ways to buy items, that decrease the number of vehicles on the street. Also, it is a solution for traffic congestions in hectic cities, and the environment will have some improvements too.
In conclusion, the reasons as well as the effects of this trend are mentioned above. In my opinion, its advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Therefore, governments should make a policy to help this develop in the long run.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... years have witnessed the demolition of a large number of street stores to make way for other pur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90529247911 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67326762976 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598885793872 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3201500785 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.05 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.95 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205942329493 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556840202373 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499252499955 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117262821072 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502008439215 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... years have witnessed the demolition of a large number of street stores to make way for other pur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90529247911 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67326762976 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598885793872 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3201500785 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.05 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.95 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205942329493 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556840202373 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499252499955 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117262821072 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502008439215 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.