Many major cities are facing a housing crisis as they cannot provide enough land for new buildings. Some local governments believe the problem could be solved by reassigning parkland for residential development because this land would be better used for housing.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In order to deal with the increasing accommodation shortage, numerous authorities of big cities assume that parkland would be better transferred to serve residential purposes. From my perspective, I don't encourage it as an effective and thorough solution to the housing issue.
First of all, city parks are significant open spaces that play a vital role in social and well-being, removing them may arise plenty of adverse impacts on the life quality of city-dwellers. As a matter of fact, green spaces serve as a lung of the cities to clean the air, attenuate noise and cool down the atmosphere. Moreover, the availability of parks encourages active lifestyles and reduces health costs among residents. Therefore, cities with integrated large parks area are usually more attractive than the ones with only artificial constructions.
Second, creating more settlements for citizens can not serve the problems of urbanization from its root. The main reason accredited to the housing crisis is the disparity between metropolitan cities and their neighboring rural areas. The advantages of more opportunities for higher-value occupations, better social facilities, and higher living standards in the major cities lead to the tendency of migrating and centralized in one area. Thereby, establishing more buildings can even worse the issues, attract more people to shift towards the cities, and create a burden on the economy and living environment of the locals.
In conclusion, I believed that parkland is never a suitable alternative for novel residential buildings. Instead, actions regarding developing the infrastructure of surrounding outskirts of the cities with well-connected transport facilities are possibly more practical and accurate.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ential purposes. From my perspective, I dont encourage it as an effective and thorou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63498098859 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18888341463 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650190114068 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2881981627 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174493233104 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596296715819 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520579131446 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103441477976 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403837888772 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ential purposes. From my perspective, I dont encourage it as an effective and thorou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63498098859 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18888341463 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650190114068 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2881981627 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174493233104 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596296715819 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520579131446 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103441477976 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403837888772 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.