Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree?
Everything in the world is progressing forward throwing humans into abyss of comfort and dependence. The beauty of hardship of life lost its beauty overtime and growing uglier as days follows. Busy schedule and release of various varities of eatables persuade public to opt buying food. The question is, are they beneficial for health? This is discussed below before giving final verdict.
The very motive of any manufacturer to release the product is to make profitable sales and food industry is not excluded. Other motive includes the sustainability among other companies for which they like their product to be tastier. These companies cares less about wellness of public and more about its flavour and attractiveness to lure people to grab it no matter what. Over usage of sugar and artificial colors has been added to serve the purpose. But, consumption of such products causes severe health issues like diabetes, cavities etc.
Furthermore, A group of scientists from the University of Concordia , Canada discovered that over eating of sugar disrupts the functioning of various systems in our body. Will the hike of price escape this dangerous effects and thereby discourage people from reaching them? To some extent it might keep lower and middle economic class people at bay. But what about upper middle class and higher class elites. There will be no change in their lifestyle. Also, the latter needs good health.
In my opinion, making overy loaded sugary food items expensive doesn't help totally but spreading awareness on the hazardous effects by the intake helps. Besides, goverment also should consider posing restriction on usage of sugar. Also, make sure to inspect the companies and its food products now and then to make sure management follows the norms set by the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...entists from the University of Concordia , Canada discovered that over eating of s...
^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...very loaded sugary food items expensive doesnt help totally but spreading awareness on...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, then, well, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20274914089 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56955229304 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670103092784 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4043563315 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6842105263 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3157894737 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47368421053 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192526778641 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459344862839 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345842601146 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991347960027 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626060974023 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.