With the inclusive development of the world, many diseases rate has increased exponentially, and one of the main reasons is due to the diet high in sugar. This phenomenon makes the goverment questions whether they should make sugary products more costly to avoid this. Personally, despite these harmful impacts on health, I find it not practical to adopt this method.
Firstly, there is a clarity that sugar doesn't pose threat to people's health indeed, but the high amount of sugar that humans digest. In fact, anything we overuse all have specific particular negative effects on people's wellbeing. For example, overusing salt can cause hypertension, as well as overusing sugar results in diabetes and obesity. Besides, sugar also plays an important role in some aspects. in cuisine, it helps dishes more delicious and arouse people's appetite. In terms of health, sugar is one of the kinds of carbohydrate, which makes up a significant percentage of energy humans get from food, compared with protein and lipid.
Another convincing reason is that not only overeating sugary products but also an unhealthy lifestyle cause health problems like diabetes and obesity. In other words, high levels of sugar intake aren't capable of causing health obstacles singly. Many people who over digest sugary food tend to lead a sedentary lifestyle. If they work out regularly and be more active, obesity and diabetes don't likely to occur. Therefore, we should encourage people to combine controlling their diet and do exercises instead of only emphasizing on sugar amount people use.
In conclusion, I am not inclined to the practise of making sugary products expensive to restrict people's consumption of sugar for potential reasons: sugar itself doesn't harm to people's health, and the combination of a healthy diet and being active is more reasonable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... Firstly, there is a clarity that sugar doesnt pose threat to peoples health indeed, b...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e certain particular negative effects on peoples wellbeing. For exmaple, overusin...
^^
Line 2, column 377, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the aspects') or simply say ''some aspects''.
Suggestion: some of the aspects; some aspects
...des, sugar also plays important role in some of aspects. in cuisin, it helps dishes more delici...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...lays important role in some of aspects. in cuisin, it helps dishes more delicious ...
^^
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elicious and arouse peoples appetite. In terms of health, sugar is one of kinds o...
^^
Line 2, column 555, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'percentage'?
Suggestion: percentage
...onhydrate, which makes up a significant percentages of energy human get from food, comparin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ther words, high levels of sugar intake isnt capable of causing health obstacle sing...
^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...and be more active, obesity and diabete doesnt likely to occur. Therefore, we should e...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...gar for potential reasons: sugar itself doesnt harm to people heath and the combinatio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2724137931 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69138096711 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7805737134 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401562222141 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110147266449 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582227595165 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231049644251 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538613427876 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.