Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Many museums and historical heritages nowadays are swarming with oversea tourist but not local people. There are a number of reasons behind this point of view and solutions to tackle it.
There are various reasons why local people are not interested in visiting museums and historical sites. First of all, local people have been tie to their place since they were a child. Therefore, they are too familiar with the history of their region, whereas, foreigners who is new to a local culture so they may discovery via museums and historical places for satisfying their curiosity. In addition, the way museums arranging exhibits is a dearth of creativity that make the local find it boring. For an example, in Vietnam, the museums tend to show the stuff in a linear without its own story. It is such a simple and unattractive arrangement.
However, measures must be taken to solve these issues by the government. The first solution is that the museums and historical places are allowed to use government funding for the arts to refresh exhibit to appeal to local people coming and appreciating literary and artistic heritage there by new methods. For instance, the virtual reality (VR) technology should be applied in museums that have ability to display clearly how life in the past was or how incident people use the stuffs. This is definitely a way can deeply impress on people. The second solution is that the government can stimulate local people to visit museums and heritage sites through boosting advertisement for their image on poster, TV programmes, social media. For an example, in Japan, they embark on creating fan page for museums and it is very succesful to appeal not only tourists but also japanese.
In conclusion, It is obvious that there are a variety reasons for losing the attraction of museums and historical sites and steps need to be done to deal with these problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95611285266 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61508903434 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542319749216 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1277907002 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374705144739 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120890374507 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897127697787 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222067921337 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219889999943 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.